Kids-Sold-to-Serve-a.jpg
  • For over a decade “evidence based practice” has been part of the jargon of children’s services. At the outset, the phrase acknowledged what had been a grievous lack of determination to prove that the medicine of social care was working. These days, by contrast, everyone concerned professes an interest but there is startlingly little agreement on standards of evidence. This selection of stories attempts to bring order to buzzword chaos.

Bringing standards of evidence to order

Washington learns how to keep the faith

19 May 2009
Once the streetcorner trade of the hard-boiled detective, “fidelity monitoring” of a nobler kind looks like becoming an essential aspect of wise program implementation.

Laying new foundations for the evidence base

13 Jul 2009
Prevention science teaches the importance of consistent analytical method. So, if you were to compare eight databases of effective violence prevention programs, you’d expect to find the same names appearing in roughly the same short order. Well, wouldn’t you?

Clues to the evidence maze – this might work

14 Jul 2009
Something more compelling than a mere association between cause and effect, reliance on more than one trial, a complete declaration of positive and negative results – US Society for Prevention Research efficacy standards may sound eminently reasonable but they raise the bar higher than many program evaluators can easily reach.

It's bad science if it's just plain dull

15 Jul 2009
Efficacy trials may show that they will work in ideal conditions, but programs that are over-complicated, inadequately documented or plain dull are not fit for the real world… The US Society for Prevention Research laments the lack of scientific interest in dissemination.

Why is independent scrutiny only "desirable"?

16 Jul 2009
Prevention scientists will readily agree that consistent repetition of results is the cornerstone of successful evaluation, but too many developers still bridle at the thought of independent replication. “It's a hard sell,” explains Brian Flay, chair of the US Society for Prevention Research standard-setters.

Baron leads Congress four steps toward a fruitful offer

17 Jul 2009
Is ten years in the US Defense department good training for a career persuading government to divert more funds into rigorous evaluation and to support the widespread implementation of programs that will enhance young people’s prospects. Jon Baron’s experience suggests so.